J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zundel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zundel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zundel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, S.
J Med Microbiol 55 (2006), 1717-1723; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46709-0
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Listeria monocytogenes translocates throughout the digestive tract in asymptomatic sheep

Etienne Zundel and Serge Bernard

INRA, Infectiologie Animale et Santé Publique, 37380 Nouzilly, France

Correspondence
Etienne Zundel
zundel{at}tours.inra.fr

Received 5 May 2006
Accepted 12 August 2006


Ruminants are fed forage which is often contaminated with Listeria, and frequently shed Listeria monocytogenes with their faeces. The present study was designed to localize the sites of infection in the digestive tract concomitant with Listeria faecal excretion in a sheep model. Ten Listeria-free sheep were inoculated per os with a dose of 1010 c.f.u. of a pathogenic L. monocytogenes strain. Listeria received by two of the ten animals were radiolabelled with 111indium oxine. The dissemination of the Listeria was assessed by in vivo imaging, by culture of bacteria in the faeces, organs and digesta samples taken at slaughter on days 1, 2, 6, 10 and 14 post-inoculation, and by measuring gamma radioactivity of samples on day 6. It was shown that Listeria spread through the entire volume of the forestomachs within 4 h, and through the whole gastrointestinal tract (GIT) within 24 h. Faecal shedding of Listeria lasted 10 days. Rumen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon walls and digesta, mesenteric lymph nodes, liver and spleen were temporarily infected. However, Listeria persisted for at least 14 days in rumen digesta and retropharyngeal lymph nodes, and at a relatively high level (1x104 c.f.u. g–1) in palatine tonsils. These findings suggest that L. monocytogenes can translocate from all parts of the GIT, with the rumen digesta, but not the gallbladder, serving as a reservoir. The results indicate that brief and low-level faecal excretion of L. monocytogenes is concomitant with a transitory asymptomatic infection in sheep.


Abbreviations: GIT, gastrointestinal tract; MPN, most probable number; PI, post-inoculation; ROI, region of interest.

Scintigraphic imaging of the spread of L. monocytogenes radiolabelled with 111In oxine in sheep nos 5 and 6 is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1 with the online version of this paper.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is widespread in nature and frequently contaminates fodder (Fenlon, 1999). It is associated with several diseases (listeriosis) in both humans and animals (Low & Donachie, 1997). Humans generally become infected with L. monocytogenes by consuming contaminated food products (Slutsker & Schuchat, 1999). Sheep, cattle and goats often shed L. monocytogenes in their faeces without symptoms (Wesley, 1999). The farm sources of contamination for human foods such as milk are the animals themselves and the environment (McLauchlin, 1997). Since L. monocytogenes mastitis is rare (Jensen et al., 1996), raw milk is mainly contaminated from the environment, probably by faeces when farming and milking procedures are carried out under conditions of inadequate hygiene (Sanaa et al., 1993). Two-month-old lambs experimentally inoculated with a 6x1010 c.f.u. oral dose shed L. monocytogenes with faeces, but lambs inoculated with a 6x106 c.f.u. dose did not (Lhopital et al., 1993). The lambs of both groups had detectable IgG antibodies to listeriolysin O (LLO), suggesting that a subclinical infection had occurred (Lhopital et al., 1993). Older sheep also orally inoculated with a 1010 c.f.u. dose remained well, and triggered the production of anti-LLO antibodies (Baetz et al., 1996; Low & Donachie, 1991). We have recently shown that sheep given a 104 or 106 c.f.u. dose do not develop antibodies to LLO or IrpA (Zundel et al., 2006), unlike those given 1010 c.f.u. Thus, infection in the digestive tract seems to depend not so much on predisposing conditions and the animals' immune status (Low & Donachie, 1997), but more particularly on the dose ingested and the age of the animal. Knowledge of the intestinal sites of translocation and multiplication that result in asymptomatic faecal excretion of Listeria in sheep would improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of ovine listeriosis and Listeria carriage and excretion on the farm.

The present study was designed to localize the sites of infection in the digestive tract concomitant with Listeria faecal excretion in a sheep model. Radiolabelled or non-radiolabelled L. monocytogenes was orally administered to animals, and dissemination was assessed by in vivo imaging, bacteriological detection and gamma radioactivity measurements at slaughter. Our results indicate that brief and low-level faecal excretion of L. monocytogenes is concomitant with a transitory asymptomatic infection in sheep, after translocation from every segment of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), with the rumen digesta serving as a reservoir.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals. Ten Lacaune sheep were born and reared in a Listeria-free environment in category 3 containment level facilities of our laboratory. They were housed together on a duckboard, exposed to a light–dark cycle of 24 h (light–dark 12 : 12), and fed pelleted alfalfa and flattened cereals ad libitum. Sheep were 8 months old and weighed 55.3±3.8 kg at the time of oral inoculation with L. monocytogenes [day 0 (D0)]. The use of animals complied with the European Directive 86/609/EEC (1986/11/24).

L. monocytogenes inoculum and labelling with 111indium oxine. The LCCN 95-962 L. monocytogenes strain serotype 1/2a had previously been isolated in our laboratory from a ewe with clinical listeriosis. In vivo and in vitro virulence tests (Roche et al., 2001) have confirmed the virulence observed in the field. We labelled bacteria with 111In oxine (half-life 67 h), because radioactivity is incorporated very rapidly (90 % within 10 min) with little damage to bacteria, and 111In released from the cells would not be reutilized (Ardehali & Mohammad, 1993). In brief, a 24 h culture on trypticase soy agar (TSA; bioMérieux) was suspended, washed and spectrophotometrically titrated to 4x1010 c.f.u. ml–1 in 4.5 ml PBS. The bacterial suspension was centrifuged (4000 g, 4 °C for 30 min). The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was mixed with 0.2 ml 74 mBq 111In oxine (Mallinckrodt). The solution was corrected to pH 6 with 0.2 M Tris. After 15 min at room temperature, the reaction was stopped with 20 ml PBS with 10 % fetal calf serum (Invitrogen). The labelled bacteria were washed twice in PBS by centrifugation. We achieved a labelling efficiency of 64 % (percentage of the initially added radioactivity), which corresponds to an excellent incorporation of radiolabel in bacteria (Perin et al., 1997). Radiolabelled bacteria were resuspended in 0.110 ml PBS, and 10 µl was used for enumeration of viable organisms. The viability of the radioactive inoculum was not different from that of mock-labelled bacteria that had been processed under the same conditions, except for the absence of the radioactive oxine.

Cold and radiolabelled inocula were adjusted to 1011 c.f.u. ml–1. In order to mimic natural oral contamination, cotton swabs (bioMérieux) were impregnated with 100 µl inoculum (1011 c.f.u. ml–1) and fed to the two animals selected for in vivo imaging on D0, 2 h after normal feeding.

Scintigraphic imaging. We chose scintigraphy to monitor the spread of bacteria because it is a non-invasive technique usable in vivo. The sheep were anaesthetized with a 5–2 % halothane in air influx at 2 l min–1. On D0 [30 min and 4 h post-inoculation (PI)], D1, D2, D3 and D6, ventral and lateral (right decubitus) 2–10 min static images were acquired using a gamma camera (Opti-CGR) equipped with a high resolution, low-energy, parallel collimator. Data were recorded using a 15 % window centred on the 170 keV photopeak of 111In into a 256x256 pixel matrix on a computer system specialized in digital display and analysis (Mirage, Segami). Distribution of radioactive bacteria was assessed from static images using regions of interest (ROI) for different body areas (head, thorax, abdomen and pelvis). After correction for radioactive decrease, the count rate recorded within these regions was used to calculate the percentage of radioactivity injected on D0 for each ROI, and to edit images (available as Supplementary Fig. S1 in JMM Online).

Sample radioactivity at slaughter. Sheep nos 5 and 6 were slaughtered on D6, and samples were collected as described below. Immediately before culturing for Listeria, 1 ml of each sample suspension in half-Fraser broth was counted (Cobra gamma counter, Packard). The radioactivity was expressed as disintegrations per minute per gram of sample (d.p.m. g–1). The residual radioactivity in organs at slaughter indicated the presence of live or formerly live bacteria. By counting the radionuclide and bacterial counts in serial dilutions of the labelled suspension, it was determined that a count of 3 d.p.m. corresponded to approximately one viable bacterium. The lower limit of detection of the gamma-counting system was 50–100 bacteria, depending on the background radioactivity level. Survival of bacteria was defined as the ratio of (numbers of Listeria counted on plates)/(numbers of Listeria calculated from d.p.m. counts) (Eaves-Pyles & Alexander, 2001). A ratio below one suggested that the overall number of bacteria decreased after translocation, and above one that it increased.

Sample collection. Sheep were subsequently monitored for symptoms, and their faeces, feed and drinking water were checked for Listeria once a month for 6 months before inoculation. Faeces and saliva were regularly taken in the morning before feeding, from live animals after inoculation (Table 1Go). Faeces were collected directly from the rectum, and placed in individual screw-capped specimen bottles, with gloves changed before each individual collection. Saliva samples (125 µl maximum volume) were taken with a plastic-rod rayon swab (Coplan). Samples were processed in our laboratory within 30 min of collection. Two sheep per day were euthanized with sodium thiopental on D1, D2, D6, D10 and D14 PI. Samples (up to 25 g when possible) were aseptically collected from 25 organs and digesta from all ten sheep. GIT segment samples included the oesophagus, rumen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon (distal loop). A digesta sample was collected from each GIT segment, except the oesophagus. GIT tissue from a 20 cm (ileum) to 60 cm (jejunum) sample was rinsed with saline to remove visible digesta. Palatine tonsils, retropharyngeal and mesenteric lymph nodes as local lymphoid organs, and liver, spleen and blood [about 20 ml in evacuated blood-collecting tubes with lithium heparin (Venoject; Terumo)] as systemic organs were harvested.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Number of animals with L. monocytogenes recovered before slaughter in ten sheep inoculated per os with 1010 c.f.u. L. monocytogenes on D0

 
Listeria culture of samples. Samples were tested using a bacteriologically selective enrichment test (AFNOR, 1997). In brief, a sample was incubated (24 h, 30 °C) in nine volumes of enrichment broth (half-Fraser, Oxoid). A 100 µl aliquot was then placed in 10 ml Fraser broth and incubated (24 and 48 h, 37 °C). This subculture (0.2 ml) was plated on Oxford agar (Oxoid) and incubated (24–48 h, 37 °C). Listeria-like colonies were confirmed as described below. This enrichment resulted in a positive or negative culture.

Listeria from rumen digesta samples were counted using the most probable number (MPN) method (Blodgett, 2001) in Fraser broth tubes. Listeria from saliva were counted with a direct plating method on TSA, and those from other samples were serially diluted and plated on Oxford plates (AFNOR, 1997). Quantitative results were expressed in c.f.u. g–1. When necessary, Listeria-like colonies were streaked on TSA plates and confirmed by examining the colonies under obliquely reflected light (McClain & Lee, 1988), and by standard methods: catalase reaction (positive), haemolysis of horse blood agar (bioMérieux), Christie–Atkins–Munch–Petersen (CAMP) test, and acid production from D-xylose (negative), L-rhamnose (positive) and mannitol (negative). The results were confirmed with API Listeria (bioMérieux) when necessary.

Because of dilution factors, the lowest detectable counts were 1 c.f.u. per 25 g (MPN), 50 c.f.u. per g or ml (direct plating) and 200 c.f.u. per ml (direct plating with saliva). The limit of detection of the enrichment technique was 1 c.f.u. per 25 g. Therefore samples positive after enrichment contained between 0.04 and 50 or 200 c.f.u. g–1. To facilitate reading of graphical representations, we arbitrarily assumed enrichment results to correspond to 10 c.f.u. g–1 (Fig. 1Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean numbers of L. monocytogenes in samples collected at slaughter (two sheep per day) of ten sheep inoculated per os with 1010 c.f.u. L. monocytogenes at D0. Abbreviations: R+L, right and left; retro., retropharyngeal; LN, lymph nodes. Data are expressed as mean±mean deviation about the mean.

 

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sheep are naturally susceptible to listerial infection (Low & Donachie, 1997), whereas mice are not (Lecuit et al., 2001; Marco et al., 1997). In addition, the murine GIT is not representative of that of ruminants. Some studies in mice have focused on the digestive phase of listeriosis (Gahan & Hill, 2005) and have established that the gallbladder is colonized by L. monocytogenes (Hardy et al., 2004), but no data are available for sheep. We chose a sheep model (Lhopital et al., 1993) in order to assess the dissemination of orally administered bacteria in the body and to localize the site of infection in asymptomatic carriers with low-level faecal excretion of L. monocytogenes.

Listeria excretion

Listeria were not recovered from the faeces, feed or drinking water prior to inoculation. The experimental inoculation resulted in a low-level excretion in saliva for 13 days, and in faeces for a shorter time: up to 10 days (Table 1Go), in line with previous results (Lhopital et al., 1993). In another study, a 104 or 106 c.f.u. dose in sheep appeared to have no effect on faecal excretion (Zundel et al., 2006). All ten animals remained well, without symptoms, throughout the study, even when they shed Listeria, and thus were considered as asymptomatic carriers.

Spread of Listeria

After inoculation, scintigraphic images taken successively from the ROI were grouped in one figure (Supplementary Fig. S1). Body outline was added to the images (white line). The head and neck showed very little labelling 30 min or 4 h post-inoculation in sheep no. 5. The white spot in its rumen (arrows, Supplementary Fig. S1) corresponds to the swab head containing the inoculum, swallowed without chewing, as is usual for ruminants. It was seen again on D1 in the right subcostal area, and on D2 in the lower left side of the belly. The mouth of sheep no. 6 was labelled immediately after inoculation. Its inoculum swab having been chewed, Listeria spread more rapidly and more efficiently in its forestomachs during the first 4 h. In comparison, Escherichia coli O157 : H7 was isolated from the duodenum digesta 1 h after 2x1011 c.f.u. E. coli was directly inoculated into the rumen of steers with cannulae inserted into both the rumen and duodenum (Grauke et al., 2002). But precise tomographic localization could only have been obtained by single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT), and was not possible using planar scintigraphic acquisition, although the camera used in this study facilitated quantitative analysis. The spread of L. monocytogenes in the lumen of the GIT, as seen with scintigraphy, is concomitant with bacterial translocation throughout the different segments of the GIT, as observed by culturing samples collected within 48 h of inoculation (Fig. 1Go). It is worthy of note that detectable Listeria dissemination was maximal and the rectum was labelled on D1 for both sheep (dashed lines, Supplementary Fig. S1).

Listeria translocation to deep organs

Bacteriological analyses at slaughter confirmed the presence of Listeria in all samples of two sheep within 24 h of inoculation, with the exception of blood and bile. The mean numbers of Listeria in samples are shown in Fig. 1Go for digesta, GIT walls and lymphoid organs. The greatest number of Listeria in the GIT was approximately 105 c.f.u. per gram of digesta on D1 and of walls on D2. Very few Listeria were isolated from digesta and walls in the distal part of the GIT. Listeria were recovered from mesenteric lymph nodes from D1 onwards, with a maximum number on D2 (Fig. 1Go). Numbers in the tonsils and the retropharyngeal lymph nodes were higher than those of mesenteric lymph nodes, probably because the doses were given on a swab and not with a worming gun. A few bacteria reached the liver and spleen (<50 c.f.u. g–1), as systemic lymphoid organs. Thus our study revealed the ability of Listeria to translocate from every segment of the GIT.

Samples collected at slaughter (D6) from sheep nos 5 and 6 were measured for gamma radioactivity and bacterial enumeration (Fig. 2Go). Samples from sheep no. 6 were more often contaminated or infected with Listeria than those of sheep no. 5, although numbers were close to the lower detection limit. There was no real difference between the Listeria counts in the lymphoid organs of the head, although sheep no. 5 did not chew the inoculum swab. Twelve samples (saliva, blood, coeliac, jejunal, ileo-caecal and colic lymph nodes, oesophagus, rumen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon tissues) had very low radioactivity, close to the background level, in these two sheep. Therefore, these samples were considered ‘double-negative’. The scatter diagram (not shown) of the radioactive samples from faeces, GIT digesta, caecum wall, palatine tonsils, retropharyngeal lymph nodes, spleen, liver and bile showed that both sheep dealt with L. monocytogenes in the same way (R2=0.932).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. L. monocytogenes numbers [log10(c.f.u. g–1); white bars] and radioactivity (d.p.m. g–1; black bars) at slaughter of sheep nos 5 and 6 on D6 inoculated per os with 1010 c.f.u. L. monocytogenes radiolabelled with 111In on D0. Abbreviations: R+L, right and left; retro., retropharyngeal. The limit of detection was estimated to be 10 c.f.u. g–1 (see text).

 
In digesta samples collected at D6, an increase in radioactivity level was apparent downstream from the duodenum to the faeces, conversely to bacterial counts, but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.075, Kendall's W coefficient of concordance). The faeces samples were the most radioactive, with a Listeria survival ratio of almost 0. 111In is not excreted from bacteria, except when bacterial lysis occurs (Eaves-Pyles & Alexander, 1998). Moreover, 111In does not accumulate in the genitourinary and gastro-intestinal tracts (Hughes, 2003). Therefore, Listeria elimination prevailed on proliferation in the GIT lumen. The low radionuclide counts of GIT walls and mesenteric lymph nodes suggest that only a part of the initial inoculum translocated and reached draining lymph nodes, where bacteria proliferate temporarily (D2, Fig. 1Go). Radiolabelled bacteria differentiated the role of the wall permeability to bacteria of the GIT lumen from that of the immune clearance of bacteria (Gianotti et al., 1995). The low to moderate radioactivity on D6 in the liver and spleen confirmed that Listeria cultured on D1 and D2 (Fig. 1Go) were eliminated. Therefore, our results show that the efficiency of Listeria translocation was low to moderate in sheep. The efficiency of listerial penetration is lower in mice (Marco et al., 1992) and in a rat ligated-ileal-loop model (Pron et al., 1998). The main point is that GIT lymph nodes were initially sites of temporary multiplication and then became sites of lysis and elimination of Listeria, in the same way as the liver, spleen and intestinal lumen.

Listeria systemic infection

The presence of L. monocytogenes in lymphoid organs, including spleen and liver, confirmed the systemic though subclinical course of infection after oral inoculation. An important finding was that no Listeria were isolated from bile, although sheep bile experimentally inoculated (2x102 c.f.u. ml–1) and incubated (24 h, 37 °C) allowed L. monocytogenes LCCN 95-962 to grow up to 2x108 c.f.u. ml–1. The same growth was observed in C57/Bl6 mice bile. Therefore it does not seem that excretion with bile would cause faecal excretion of Listeria in sheep, as shown in mice with a sublethal dose (Briones et al., 1992; Marco et al., 1997), or an enterohepatic circulation of L. monocytogenes (Hardy et al., 2004). Radioactivity in tonsils and retropharyngeal lymph nodes was moderate, but Listeria counts remained high for 2 weeks, thus suggesting that bacteria increased in number in these lymphoid organs, which can therefore be considered as sites of multiplication (Fig. 2Go). This result is strengthened by the particularly high survival ratio of L. monocytogenes (over 400) in tonsils. Tonsils provide good evidence of food-borne contamination, as shown in pigs, in which 22 % of tonsils have been demonstrated to be Listeria positive in different slaughterhouses (Autio et al., 2004). Tonsils can also be used by bacteria such as Salmonella Typhimurium as a site of chronic infection up to 140 days after inoculation, resulting in asymptomatic carrier animals (Horter et al., 2003). However, under our conditions, the sheep tonsils were not able to contribute significantly to Listeria faecal excretion, since they were situated upstream of the GIT, and they remained infected at up to a total count of 5x104 c.f.u. after the faecal excretion of Listeria had stopped.

Persistence of Listeria infection

Listeria numbers in tonsils and retropharyngeal lymph nodes were stable until D14, probably due to local growth of bacteria and rumination. Ruminants regurgitate foodstuff from the rumen, and chew it again for 8 h per day. In fact, Listeria continued to be isolated from rumen digesta and the duodenum wall on D14. There were more than 1.1x104 Listeria g–1 in rumen digesta (volume ~10 l) on D1, decreasing to 15 c.f.u. g–1 on D14. Radioactivity in rumen digesta was moderate, with 103 c.f.u. ml–1 at D6, i.e. at least 107 c.f.u. Listeria in the total content, with a survival ratio of 9. The renewal of the rumen content is continuous, and takes on average about 20 h for dry matter (Cannas et al., 2003). Therefore, Listeria probably multiplied to make up in part for the permanent through-flow, the negative effects of interaction with rumen flora (around 106 ciliate protozoa, 108–1011 bacteria and 108 bacteriophages per millilitre), and even anti-Listeria bacteriocins (Laukova & Czikkova, 1998). Conversely, E. coli O157 : H7 does not seem to persist in the sheep rumen (Grauke et al., 2002). Therefore, a remarkable finding in our study was that the rumen content, like tonsils and retropharyngeal lymph nodes, was a long-lasting site of Listeria multiplication. The rumen can thus be considered as a reservoir for L. monocytogenes, discharging Listeria downstream into the GIT for at least 2 weeks after a single per os inoculation. However, faecal excretion of Listeria stopped before the bacterium disappeared from the head lymphoid organs, the rumen content and the duodenum wall (the enrichment limit of detection was 1 c.f.u. per 25 grams). These data support the hypothesis that a threshold number of Listeria is needed at the proximal part of the bowel to obtain Listeria in faeces. On the farm, the rumen can thus buffer heavy food-borne contamination, as in heterogeneous silage (Fenlon, 1999), and contribute to a low-level excretion of L. monocytogenes in faeces.

In conclusion, our results strongly suggest that the sporadic, intermittent and short-term faecal excretion of L. monocytogenes in ruminants given contaminated food on the farm is not a simple passage of the bacteria, but is associated with a transitory multiplication in the rumen content and a transitory infection, i.e. an asymptomatic carrier state.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank the INRA – Pii experimental facilities staff (head, N. Kasal), and P. Bernardet, R. Delaunay, D. Gauthier, P. Lallier, J. Moreau and D. Musset for animal care and help with sample collection in confinement facilities. We also thank E. Bottreau, H. Leroux, J. Marly, S. Rochereau and J. Trotereau for technical assistance. This work was supported in part by a grant from the French Ministry of Agriculture as part of the ‘Food, Quality, Safety’ Interdepartmental Programme. We thank P. Velge for critical reading of the manuscript.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
AFNOR (1997). Microbiologie Alimentaire – Recherche de Listeria monocytogenes – Méthode de Routine. Norme V 08–055. Paris: Association Française de Normalisation.

Ardehali, R. & Mohammad, S. F. (1993). 111Indium labeling of microorganisms to facilitate the investigation of bacterial adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 27, 269–275.[CrossRef][Medline]

Autio, T., Markkula, A., Hellstrom, S., Niskanen, T., Lunden, J. & Korkeala, H. (2004). Prevalence and genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes in the tonsils of pigs. J Food Prot 67, 805–808.[Medline]

Baetz, A. L., Wesley, I. V. & Stevens, M. G. (1996). The use of listeriolysin O in an ELISA, a skin test and a lymphocyte blastogenesis assay on sheep experimentally infected with Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria ivanovii or Listeria innocua. Vet Microbiol 51, 151–159.[CrossRef][Medline]

Blodgett, R. (2001). Most probable number from serial dilutions. In Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam-a2.html (accessed 3 November 2003).

Briones, V., Blanco, M. M., Marco, A., Prats, N., Fernandez-Garayzabal, J. F., Suarez, G., Domingo, M. & Dominguez, L. (1992). Biliary excretion as possible origin of Listeria monocytogenes in fecal carriers. Am J Vet Res 53, 191–193.[Medline]

Cannas, A., Van Soest, P. J. & Pell, A. N. (2003). Use of animal and dietary information to predict rumen turnover. Anim Feed Sci Technol 106, 95–117.[CrossRef]

Eaves-Pyles, T. & Alexander, J. W. (1998). Rapid and prolonged impairment of gut barrier function after thermal injury in mice. Shock 9, 95–100.[Medline]

Eaves-Pyles, T. & Alexander, J. W. (2001). Comparison of translocation of different types of microorganisms from the intestinal tract of burned mice. Shock 16, 148–152.[Medline]

Fenlon, D. R. (1999). Listeria monocytogenes in the natural environment. In Listeria, Listeriosis and Food Safety, pp. 21–37. Edited by E. T. Ryser & E. H. Marth. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Gahan, C. G. & Hill, C. (2005). Gastrointestinal phase of Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Appl Microbiol 98, 1345–1353.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gianotti, L., Bergamo, C., Braga, M., Socci, C., Baraldini, V., Magnani, P., Mangili, F., Locatelli, M. & Di Carlo, V. (1995). In vivo evaluation of timing, degree, and distribution of bacterial translocation following experimental small bowel transplantation. Transplantation 60, 891–896.[Medline]

Grauke, L., Kudva, I. T., Yoon, J. W., Hunt, C. W., Williams, C. J. & Hovde, C. J. (2002). Gastrointestinal tract location of Escherichia coli O157 : H7 in ruminants. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 2269–2277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hardy, J., Francis, K. P., Deboer, M., Chu, P., Gibbs, K. & Contag, C. H. (2004). Extracellular replication of Listeria monocytogenes in the murine gall bladder. Science 303, 851–853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Horter, D. C., Yoon, K. J. & Zimmerman, J. J. (2003). A review of porcine tonsils in immunity and disease. Anim Health Res Rev 4, 143–155.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hughes, D. K. (2003). Nuclear medicine and infection detection: the relative effectiveness of imaging with 111In-oxine-, 99mTc-HMPAO-, and 99mTc-stannous fluoride colloid-labeled leukocytes and with 67Ga-citrate. J Nucleic Med Technol 31, 196–201.

Jensen, N. E., Aarestrup, F. M., Jensen, J. & Wegener, H. C. (1996). Listeria monocytogenes in bovine mastitis. Possible implication for human health. Int J Food Microbiol 32, 209–216.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laukova, A. & Czikkova, S. (1998). Inhibition effect of enterocin CCM 4231 in the rumen fluid environment. Lett Appl Microbiol 26, 215–218.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lecuit, M., Vandormael-Pournin, S., Lefort, J., Huerre, M., Gounon, P., Dupuy, C., Babinet, C. & Cossart, P. (2001). A transgenic model for listeriosis: role of internalin in crossing the intestinal barrier. Science 292, 1722–1725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lhopital, S., Marly, J., Pardon, P. & Berche, P. (1993). Kinetics of antibody production against listeriolysin O in sheep with listeriosis. J Clin Microbiol 31, 1537–1540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Low, J. C. & Donachie, W. (1991). Clinical and serum antibody responses to lambs to infection by Listeria monocytogenes. Res Vet Sci 51, 185–192.[Medline]

Low, J. C. & Donachie, W. (1997). A review of Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis. Vet J 153, 9–29.[CrossRef][Medline]

Marco, A. J., Prats, N., Ramos, J. A., Briones, V., Blanco, M., Dominguez, L. & Domingo, M. (1992). A microbiological, histopathological and immunohistological study of the intragastric inoculation of Listeria monocytogenes in mice. J Comp Pathol 107, 1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

Marco, A. J., Altimira, J., Prats, N., Lopez, S., Dominguez, L., Domingo, M. & Briones, V. (1997). Penetration of Listeria monocytogenes in mice infected by the oral route. Microb Pathog 23, 255–263.[CrossRef][Medline]

McClain, D. & Lee, W. H. (1988). Development of USDA-FSIS method for isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from raw meat and poultry. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 71, 660–664.[Medline]

McLauchlin, J. (1997). Animal and human listeriosis: a shared problem? Vet J 153, 3–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

Perin, F., Laurence, D., Savary, I., Bernard, S. & Le Pape, A. (1997). Radioactive technetium-99m labelling of Salmonella abortusovis for the assessment of bacterial dissemination in sheep by in vivo imaging. Vet Microbiol 57, 171–180.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pron, B., Boumaila, C., Jaubert, F., Sarnacki, S., Monnet, J. P., Berche, P. & Gaillard, J. L. (1998). Comprehensive study of the intestinal stage of listeriosis in a rat ligated ileal loop system. Infect Immun 66, 747–755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roche, S. M., Velge, P., Bottreau, E., Durier, C., Marquet-van der Mee, N. & Pardon, P. (2001). Assessment of the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes: agreement between a plaque-forming assay with HT-29 cells and infection of immunocompetent mice. Int J Food Microbiol 68, 33–44.[Medline]

Sanaa, M., Poutrel, B., Menard, J. L. & Serieys, F. (1993). Risk factors associated with contamination of raw milk by Listeria monocytogenes in dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 76, 2891–2898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Slutsker, L. & Schuchat, A. (1999). Listeriosis in humans. In Listeria, Listeriosis and Food Safety, pp. 75–95. Edited by E. T. Ryser & E. H. Marth. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Wesley, I. V. (1999). Listeriosis in animals. In Listeria, Listeriosis and Food Safety, pp. 39–73. Edited by E. T. Ryser & E. H. Marth. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Zundel, E., Pelé, S., Phan-Thanh, L. & Pardon, P. (2006). Repeated daily doses do not increase Listeria monocytogenes infection in ewes as shown by faecal excretion and serological monitoring. Small Rum Res (in press).





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zundel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zundel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zundel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS