J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ison, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ison, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ison, C.
J Med Microbiol 57 (2008), 962-965; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.2008/000562-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

A comparison of two methods for the diagnosis of lymphogranuloma venereum

Sarah Alexander, Iona M. C. Martin and Catherine Ison

Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, 61 Colindale Ave, London NW9 5HT, UK

Correspondence
Sarah Alexander
sarah.alexander{at}hpa.org.uk

Received 20 January 2008
Accepted 24 April 2008

A recent outbreak of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) within the men who have sex with men (MSM) community and their requirement for extended therapy has highlighted the need for laboratory tests that differentiate LGV- from non-LGV-associated serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. Two previously described methods were evaluated against 495 clinical specimens referred to the Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Laboratory (London, UK): (i) PCR amplification of a 1.1 kb region of the ompI gene followed by restriction enzyme digestion (ompI RFLP-PCR); and (ii) real-time PCR targeting a 36 bp deletion present within the polymorphic membrane protein H gene of LGV-associated serovars (pmpH real-time PCR). For specimens that could be categorized using both methods, a 94.7 % (390/412) concordance was achieved. Eighty-three specimens were found to be untypeable by ompI RFLP-PCR due to a failure to amplify the 1.1 kb fragment. Of these 83 untypeable specimens, 19 were determined to be an LGV-associated serovar by pmpH real-time PCR. Despite the high level of concordance, there were differences found in the technical complexity of the two methods. The pmpH real-time PCR exhibited greater sensitivity, a more rapid turnaround time and a lower technical requirement. Whilst the ompI RFLP-PCR was not as robust as a laboratory diagnostic method, it did enable serovar-level identification. LGV infection remains an important threat to the health of high-risk MSM in Europe. In conclusion, the two methods for the detection of LGV from clinical samples were found not only to have a high concordance (94.7 %) but also to be complementary, and could be used in an integrated way to aid LGV detection.

Abbreviations: LGV, lymphogranuloma venereum; MSM, men who have sex with men; STBRL, Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Laboratory; UNG, uracil glycolase.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.